EdgeFlow vs TraderSync

// The honest take

// Where EdgeFlow pulls ahead

// Deep dive

TraderSync brags about 950+ broker integrations. EdgeFlow has CSV import for 4 brokers plus a generic parser. On paper that looks bad. In practice it's the wrong number to measure. What matters more is whether your journaled P&L matches your broker statement. If you've ever traded TraderSync against your broker's monthly statement, you may have noticed the gap — sync bugs and API linking failures are the most common complaint in TraderSync's 2026 Trustpilot reviews. The cause is usually subtle: a futures contract multiplier off by 10x, a crypto perpetual that double-counts funding fees, a short position that flips sign incorrectly, or a fee column that's interpreted as a separate trade. EdgeFlow's P&L calculation lives in one file (src/lib/calculations/pnl.ts) and has 22 unit tests covering long, short, fees, R-multiples, futures multipliers, and crypto perpetuals. Every edge case has a regression test. When you import a CSV, the preview table shows you the parsed P&L per trade before you commit, so you can sanity-check against your broker before saving anything. The broker count matters once — when you onboard. P&L accuracy matters every day for as long as you use the tool. If you're picking a journal to evaluate your performance, the second number is the one that compounds. We'll keep adding brokers. Rithmic, IBKR, and TradingView are next on the list. But we'd rather ship 10 parsers that are bulletproof than 950 that are mostly right.

// Full feature comparison

// Common questions